0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Optimizing time–cost in generalized construction projects using multiple-objective social group optimization and multi-criteria decision-making methods

Author(s):
Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, , n. 9, v. 27
Page(s): 2287-2313
DOI: 10.1108/ecam-08-2019-0412
Abstract:

Purpose

Project managers work to ensure successful project completion within the shortest period and at the lowest cost. One of the main tasks of a project manager in the planning phase is to generate the project time–cost curve, and furthermore, to determine the most appropriate schedule for the construction process. Numerous existing time–cost tradeoff analysis models have focused on solving a simple project representation without regarding for typical activity and project characteristics. This study aims to present a novel approach called “multiple-objective social group optimization” (MOSGO) for optimizing time–cost decisions in generalized construction projects.

Design/methodology/approach

In this paper, a novel MOGSO to mimic the time–cost tradeoff problem in generalized construction projects is proposed. The MOSGO has slightly modified the mechanism operation from the original algorithm to be a free-parameter algorithm and to enhance the exploring and exploiting balance in an optimization algorithm. The evidential reasoning technique is used to rank the global optimal obtained non-dominated solutions to help decision makers reach a single compromise solution.

Findings

Two case studies of real construction projects were investigated and the performance of MOSGO was compared to those of widely considered multiple-objective evolutionary algorithms. The comparison results indicated that the MOSGO approach is a powerful, efficient and effective tool in finding the time–cost curve. In addition, the multi-criteria decision-making approaches were applied to identify the best schedule for project implementation.

Research limitations/implications

Accordingly, the first major practical contribution of the present research is that it provides a tool for handling real-world construction projects by considering all types of construction project. The second important implication of this study derives from research finding on the hybridization multiple-objective and multi-criteria techniques to help project managers in facilitating the time–cost tradeoff (TCT) problems easily. The third implication stems from the wide-range application of the proposed model TCT.

Practical implications

The model can be used in early stages of the construction process to help project managers in selecting an appropriate plan for whole project lifecycle.

Social implications

The proposal model can be applied to multi-objective contexts in diversified fields. Moreover, the model is also a useful reference for future research.

Originality/value

This paper makes contributions to extant literature by: introducing a method for making TCT models applicable to actual projects by considering general activity precedence relations; developing a novel MOSGO algorithm to solving TCT problems in multi-objective context by a single simulation; and facilitating the TCT problems to project managers by using multi-criteria decision-making approaches.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.1108/ecam-08-2019-0412.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10576923
  • Published on:
    26/02/2021
  • Last updated on:
    26/02/2021
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine