0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Author(s):
Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: Engineering Journal, , n. 1, v. 2
Page(s): 16-20
DOI: 10.62913/engj.v2i1.22
Abstract:

Many engineers consider the design of a mill building to be 90 percent judgment and 10 percent perspiration. While the exact percentages are debatable, there is little question that judgment forms an important part of the design of such structures, particularly with regard to basic load assumptions and the evaluation of "indeterminates"—those mathematical problems with too many variables for exact solution. Some of the questions that must be resolved by the designer are: How many cranes can be expected to operate simultaneously in the general vicinity of a particular column? How often, if ever, will all cranes pick up their maximum loads with the trolleys adjacent to the column? What lateral thrusting forces can occur simultaneously? What allowance should be made for impact? Would the plant be in operation when there is maximum snow load on the roof? How stiff is the variable stiffness truss? How much resistance to rotation will the foundation afford?

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.62913/engj.v2i1.22.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10783537
  • Published on:
    16/05/2024
  • Last updated on:
    16/05/2024
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine