0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Auteur(s):
Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Engineering Journal, , n. 1, v. 2
Page(s): 16-20
DOI: 10.62913/engj.v2i1.22
Abstrait:

Many engineers consider the design of a mill building to be 90 percent judgment and 10 percent perspiration. While the exact percentages are debatable, there is little question that judgment forms an important part of the design of such structures, particularly with regard to basic load assumptions and the evaluation of "indeterminates"—those mathematical problems with too many variables for exact solution. Some of the questions that must be resolved by the designer are: How many cranes can be expected to operate simultaneously in the general vicinity of a particular column? How often, if ever, will all cranes pick up their maximum loads with the trolleys adjacent to the column? What lateral thrusting forces can occur simultaneously? What allowance should be made for impact? Would the plant be in operation when there is maximum snow load on the roof? How stiff is the variable stiffness truss? How much resistance to rotation will the foundation afford?

Structurae ne peut pas vous offrir cette publication en texte intégral pour l'instant. Le texte intégral est accessible chez l'éditeur. DOI: 10.62913/engj.v2i1.22.
  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10783537
  • Publié(e) le:
    16.05.2024
  • Modifié(e) le:
    16.05.2024
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine