0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Internationale Datenbank und Galerie für Ingenieurbauwerke

Anzeige

Autor(en):
Medium: Fachartikel
Sprache(n): Englisch
Veröffentlicht in: Engineering Journal, , n. 1, v. 2
Seite(n): 16-20
DOI: 10.62913/engj.v2i1.22
Abstrakt:

Many engineers consider the design of a mill building to be 90 percent judgment and 10 percent perspiration. While the exact percentages are debatable, there is little question that judgment forms an important part of the design of such structures, particularly with regard to basic load assumptions and the evaluation of "indeterminates"—those mathematical problems with too many variables for exact solution. Some of the questions that must be resolved by the designer are: How many cranes can be expected to operate simultaneously in the general vicinity of a particular column? How often, if ever, will all cranes pick up their maximum loads with the trolleys adjacent to the column? What lateral thrusting forces can occur simultaneously? What allowance should be made for impact? Would the plant be in operation when there is maximum snow load on the roof? How stiff is the variable stiffness truss? How much resistance to rotation will the foundation afford?

Structurae kann Ihnen derzeit diese Veröffentlichung nicht im Volltext zur Verfügung stellen. Der Volltext ist beim Verlag erhältlich über die DOI: 10.62913/engj.v2i1.22.
  • Über diese
    Datenseite
  • Reference-ID
    10783537
  • Veröffentlicht am:
    16.05.2024
  • Geändert am:
    16.05.2024
 
Structurae kooperiert mit
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine