The Comparison of Functionality of Type A And B Guide Rails of Steel Road Safety Barriers
Auteur(s): |
Daniel Bronislaw Nycz
|
---|---|
Médium: | article de revue |
Langue(s): | anglais |
Publié dans: | The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, septembre 2018, n. 3, v. 13 |
Page(s): | 274–290 |
DOI: | 10.7250/bjrbe.2018-13.416 |
Abstrait: |
The subject of the work is types A and B guide rails of steel road barriers. An experimental three-point bend test on a segment of a B-type guide rail was conducted for experimental validation of the numerical modelling of the guide rail. Numerical modelling of bend tests on A and B guide rail segments was performed. It was shown that the load-bearing capacity and energy absorbed during bending for guide rail A are more than for guide rail B, respectively. Numerical TB32 crash tests (a 1500 kg vehicle, 110 km/h impact speed, 20° impact angle) were carried out in the LS-Dyna system. The Dodge Neon vehicle model was downloaded from the National Crash Analysis Centre in the United States. A 60 m long barrier section is composed of A or B guide rail segments, SIGMA-100 posts, trapezoidal supporting elements and rectangular pads. Each segment has a total length of 4.30 m and an efficient length of 4.00 m. SIGMA-100 posts are 1.90 m long and spaced by 2.00 m. The whole barrier is assembled with M16 screws with a spherical head and a nose, strength class 4.6. The simulated crash tests showed slight differences in the functionality of guide rails A and B regarding the TB32 crash test. |
Copyright: | © 2018 Daniel Bronislaw Nycz |
License: | Cette oeuvre a été publiée sous la license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0). Il est autorisé de partager et adapter l'oeuvre tant que l'auteur est crédité et la license est indiquée (avec le lien ci-dessus). Vous devez aussi indiquer si des changements on été fait vis-à-vis de l'original. |
1.39 MB
- Informations
sur cette fiche - Reference-ID
10084539 - Publié(e) le:
09.10.2018 - Modifié(e) le:
02.06.2021