0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Optimization of All-Desert Sand Concrete Aggregate Based on Dinger–Funk Equation

Author(s):





Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: Buildings, , n. 8, v. 14
Page(s): 2332
DOI: 10.3390/buildings14082332
Abstract:

In recent years, with the development of the construction industry and the wide application of concrete materials, the demand for natural resources such as sand and gravel in China has continued to grow. The Xinjiang region is rich in natural desert sand resources due to its large desert area, which are inexpensive and easy to obtain, providing new possibilities for the production of concrete materials. The use of natural desert sand as concrete aggregate not only reduces the cost of construction but also contributes to the protection of the environment and the rational development and utilization of natural resources. However, poor particle gradation in natural desert sand leads to poor concrete properties. In this study, the Dinger–Funk equation was used to optimize the aggregate gradation of natural desert sand from Toksun, Xinjiang, and concrete specimens were prepared for mechanical properties and sulfate erosion resistance tests. The test results show that the four groups of aggregates optimized by the Dinger–Funk equation are better than the single gradation and natural gradation in terms of apparent density, bulk density, void ratio, mechanical properties, and durability of concrete. Where the distribution modulus n = 0.3 was the best, the compressive strength, splitting strength, and flexural strength were increased by 13.14%, 15.71%, and 11.08%, respectively, as compared to the natural gradation. After 90 sulfate erosion and dry–wet cycles, the mass change rate and relative dynamic elastic modulus of concrete specimens first increased and then decreased, and at the distribution modulus n = 0.3, the aggregate particles of 0.3–0.6 mm, 0.6–1.18 mm, and 1.18–2.36 mm accounted for 26.98%, 32.33%, and 40.69%, respectively, and the smallest of the mass change rates of durability was the best.

Copyright: © 2024 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License:

This creative work has been published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license which allows copying, and redistribution as well as adaptation of the original work provided appropriate credit is given to the original author and the conditions of the license are met.

  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10795578
  • Published on:
    01/09/2024
  • Last updated on:
    01/09/2024
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine