0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Comparison Study of the Heating Energy Demand for a Multi-Storey Residential Building in Romania Using Steady-State and Dynamic Methods

Author(s): ORCID


ORCID
Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: Buildings, , n. 8, v. 12
Page(s): 1246
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12081246
Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to determine the differences between the steady-state energetic method and the dynamic energetic method in a multi-storey residential building in Romania. For both methods, there are two values for the heating energy demand, one obtained with the theoretical U value and g value according to Romanian Methodology Mc 001/1-2006 and one with the real U value and g value obtained from in situ measurements. The results of our study revealed a difference between the steady-state method and the dynamic method in both cases of approximately 20%. Because the heating energy demand needs to decrease in value according to European legislation and the classical energy demand determination is shallow, as it does not take into account some important factors, it is important to use a method that produces accurate values so the economic factor does not become overwhelming.

Copyright: © 2022 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License:

This creative work has been published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license which allows copying, and redistribution as well as adaptation of the original work provided appropriate credit is given to the original author and the conditions of the license are met.

  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10692721
  • Published on:
    23/09/2022
  • Last updated on:
    10/11/2022
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine