0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Comparison Study of the Heating Energy Demand for a Multi-Storey Residential Building in Romania Using Steady-State and Dynamic Methods

Auteur(s): ORCID


ORCID
Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Buildings, , n. 8, v. 12
Page(s): 1246
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12081246
Abstrait:

The purpose of this study is to determine the differences between the steady-state energetic method and the dynamic energetic method in a multi-storey residential building in Romania. For both methods, there are two values for the heating energy demand, one obtained with the theoretical U value and g value according to Romanian Methodology Mc 001/1-2006 and one with the real U value and g value obtained from in situ measurements. The results of our study revealed a difference between the steady-state method and the dynamic method in both cases of approximately 20%. Because the heating energy demand needs to decrease in value according to European legislation and the classical energy demand determination is shallow, as it does not take into account some important factors, it is important to use a method that produces accurate values so the economic factor does not become overwhelming.

Copyright: © 2022 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License:

Cette oeuvre a été publiée sous la license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0). Il est autorisé de partager et adapter l'oeuvre tant que l'auteur est crédité et la license est indiquée (avec le lien ci-dessus). Vous devez aussi indiquer si des changements on été fait vis-à-vis de l'original.

  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10692721
  • Publié(e) le:
    23.09.2022
  • Modifié(e) le:
    10.11.2022
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine