0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Author(s):
Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: Civil Engineering Magazine, , n. 2, v. 65
Page(s): 64-66
Abstract:

For repair with tight deadlines, conventional approaches to inspection and repair might not be fast enough. Where the concept of design-build leaves off, the contractual solution of inspect-repair picks up, conflating inspection and repair into one operation, and accelerating a time-consuming, costly process. Conventional wisdom for a bridge-repair project typically dictates three sequential phases: inspection, design, then construction. A linear approach may be essential when repairs are design-intensive or complex, but can stretch the entire project over several years. A long delay between the initial bridge inspection and start of repair work allows further deterioration and compounds repair costs. For certain repair projects, especially those that demand a timely start, this sequential method of contracting may have to give way to the new concept of inspect-repair.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10015672
  • Published on:
    25/07/2004
  • Last updated on:
    14/08/2014
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine