0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Auteur(s):
Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Civil Engineering Magazine, , n. 2, v. 65
Page(s): 64-66
Abstrait:

For repair with tight deadlines, conventional approaches to inspection and repair might not be fast enough. Where the concept of design-build leaves off, the contractual solution of inspect-repair picks up, conflating inspection and repair into one operation, and accelerating a time-consuming, costly process. Conventional wisdom for a bridge-repair project typically dictates three sequential phases: inspection, design, then construction. A linear approach may be essential when repairs are design-intensive or complex, but can stretch the entire project over several years. A long delay between the initial bridge inspection and start of repair work allows further deterioration and compounds repair costs. For certain repair projects, especially those that demand a timely start, this sequential method of contracting may have to give way to the new concept of inspect-repair.

Structurae ne peut pas vous offrir cette publication en texte intégral pour l'instant.
  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10015672
  • Publié(e) le:
    25.07.2004
  • Modifié(e) le:
    14.08.2014
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine