0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Finding the link between visual inspection and key performance indicators for road bridges

 Finding the link between visual inspection and key performance indicators for road bridges
Author(s): , , , ,
Presented at IABSE Symposium: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management, Guimarães, Portugal, 27-29 March 2019, published in , pp. 737-744
DOI: 10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0737
Price: € 25.00 incl. VAT for PDF document  
ADD TO CART
Download preview file (PDF) 0.69 MB

Based on the rating from visual inspection and proposed weighting through component, system and network level, assessment procedure resulting with set of six most important Key Performance Indicato...
Read more

Bibliographic Details

Author(s): (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department for Structures, Zagreb, Croatia)
(University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department for Structures, Zagreb, Croatia)
(University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department for Structures, Zagreb, Croatia)
(University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department for Structures, Zagreb, Croatia)
(University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department for Structures, Zagreb, Croatia)
Medium: conference paper
Language(s): English
Conference: IABSE Symposium: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management, Guimarães, Portugal, 27-29 March 2019
Published in:
Page(s): 737-744 Total no. of pages: 8
Page(s): 737-744
Total no. of pages: 8
DOI: 10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0737
Abstract:

Based on the rating from visual inspection and proposed weighting through component, system and network level, assessment procedure resulting with set of six most important Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for road bridges is presented. Those are: bridge condition assessment, structural safety, traffic safety, durability indicator, availability and bridge importance in the network. KPIs organised in the radar shaped diagram serve for priority repair ranking decisions. The procedure is elaborated at the sample of five actual bridges: two reinforced concrete arch bridges, one with solid and other with hollowed cross-sections; one frame type bridge with V shaped piers; one precast slab overpass; one solid slab continuous bridge with Y type piers. Bridges are built between 1958 and 2001 and are located either at the state or at the local roads in Croatia. Spans are varying from

9.5 to 72 m and overall lengths from 22 to 120 m.

Keywords:
bridge damage assessment network Performance Indicator key performance indicator component system priority repair ranking