0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Performance of Soil-bearing Spread Footings Supporting Highway Structures

Author(s):




Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: The Open Civil Engineering Journal, , n. 1, v. 18
DOI: 10.2174/0118741495282014240217093958
Abstract:

Background

Soil-bearing spread footings (SBSF) are emerging as an increasingly attractive option for supporting highway structures. SBSF offers numerous benefits compared to deep foundations, including cost-effectiveness, accelerated construction, straightforward design, environmentally friendly characteristics, and reduced maintenance requirements.

Objective

The primary objective of this study is to assess the performance of highway structures that SBSF supports at four specific locations in Ohio. The findings from this assessment will serve as valuable recommendations for the future application of spread footings while identifying potential usage constraints.

Methods

The project team conducted a comprehensive review of documented performance data, assessed the effectiveness of existing footings, and compared these assessments against established structural performance criteria. Additionally, the team analyzed calculated settlements, provided an estimate of acceptable structural settlement, compared measured settlements with predicted values, and examined the relationship between performance and soil conditions.

Results

The data gathered, and field assessments conducted at all four sites encompassed in this investigation affirm that SBSF structures function as designed, displaying no signs of settlements or cracks associated with rideability. Both measured and calculated settlements fall within acceptable tolerances. While all structures exhibited acceptable levels of differential settlement, one encountered a differential settlement of approximately 54 mm between substructures, attributed to cohesive soil (A-6) in deeper layers.

Conclusion

SBSF structures were constructed by the manuals and guidelines established by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) and exhibited satisfactory performance. This paper also offers recommendations for settlement monitoring methods and plan notes that should be incorporated into the Ohio Department of Transportation's practices.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.2174/0118741495282014240217093958.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10771538
  • Published on:
    29/04/2024
  • Last updated on:
    29/04/2024
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine