0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Parâmetros que influenciam na resistência ao cisalhamento de vigas de concreto armado sem estribos (Influential parameters in the shear strength of RC beams without stirrups)

Author(s): ORCID
ORCID
ORCID
ORCID
ORCID
Medium: journal article
Language(s): Portuguese
Published in: Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais, , n. 4, v. 16
DOI: 10.1590/s1983-41952023000400006
Abstract:

Experimental investigations have been commonly used to improve the existing knowledge about structural design, presenting accurate conclusions regarding structure behavior. However, considering the limitations of experimental studies, such as restricted amount of strain gauges, unexpected pathologies, difficulties to foresee the correct position of cracks, or simply saving in costs, the use of numerical analysis can present some innovative approaches to understand the process of failure in concrete elements, presenting easier results where experimental programs can hardly report. This study presents the numerical analysis of eight beams experimented by Sherwood [26], with two different sizes and variable aggregate sizes, seeking to understand the influence of coarse aggregate size in shear strength of beams without stirrups. The numerical approach was used to derive the influence of each internal shear mechanism and to identify the specific amount of dowel force, shear transfer by uncracked compression zone and aggregate interlock portion. The results showed that fair results can be obtained by 2D smeared crack approaches, enabling the identification of major aggregate interlock portion in beams with bigger coarse aggregate sizes. Comparing the size effect in beams allowed us to conclude that a higher contribution of aggregate interlock contribution can be obtained in large beams, with almost 64% of the total contribution, whereas smaller beams had only 43%. To evaluate the accuracy of the studied mechanisms, the results of Sherwood [26] were compared with the standards Model Code [23], CSA-A.23.3 [24], NBR 6118 [38], and ACI 318 [39]. Regarding the prediction of element rupture by concrete internal mechanisms, the normative instructions Model Code [23] and CSA A.23.3 [24] were the closest to the experimental results.

Copyright: © 2023 Guilherme Frank Leme, Elyson Andrew Pozo Liberati, Marília Gonçalves Marques, Leandro Mouta Trautwein, Luiz Carlos de Almeida
License:

This creative work has been published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license which allows copying, and redistribution as well as adaptation of the original work provided appropriate credit is given to the original author and the conditions of the license are met.

  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10702968
  • Published on:
    10/12/2022
  • Last updated on:
    15/02/2023
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine