0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Author(s):
Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: Architectural History, , v. 49
Page(s): 1-33
DOI: 10.1017/s0066622x00002690
Abstract:

Has any architecture – even the concrete ‘shoe boxes' of the 1960s – received such consistent abuse as the neo-Tudor of the first half of the twentieth century – especially in its middle-class, suburban manifestations (Fig. 1)? ‘The abominable Tudoristic villa of the By-pass road', ‘The worst bogus Tudor housing estates', and ‘Those repellent, jerry-built, sham-Tudor houses that disfigure England' are some contemporary judgements. And as far as that enthusiast for the modern, Anthony Bertram, in his 1935 book,The House: A Machine for Living In, was concerned:

The man who builds a bogus Tudoresque villa or castellates his suburban home is committing a crime against truth and tradition: he is denying the history of progress, denying his own age and insulting the very thing he pretends to imitate by misusing it.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.1017/s0066622x00002690.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10306336
  • Published on:
    01/03/2019
  • Last updated on:
    01/03/2019
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine