Author(s): |
Gavin Stamp
|
---|---|
Medium: | journal article |
Language(s): | English |
Published in: | Architectural History, 2006, v. 49 |
Page(s): | 1-33 |
DOI: | 10.1017/s0066622x00002690 |
Abstract: |
Has any architecture – even the concrete ‘shoe boxes' of the 1960s – received such consistent abuse as the neo-Tudor of the first half of the twentieth century – especially in its middle-class, suburban manifestations (Fig. 1)? ‘The abominable Tudoristic villa of the By-pass road', ‘The worst bogus Tudor housing estates', and ‘Those repellent, jerry-built, sham-Tudor houses that disfigure England' are some contemporary judgements. And as far as that enthusiast for the modern, Anthony Bertram, in his 1935 book,The House: A Machine for Living In, was concerned: The man who builds a bogus Tudoresque villa or castellates his suburban home is committing a crime against truth and tradition: he is denying the history of progress, denying his own age and insulting the very thing he pretends to imitate by misusing it. |
- About this
data sheet - Reference-ID
10306336 - Published on:
01/03/2019 - Last updated on:
01/03/2019