Life-Cycle Assessment of Contemporary and Classical Seismic Retrofitting Approaches Applied to a Reinforced Concrete Building in Israel

This study aims to select an eco-friendly earthquake-resistant design using life-cycle assessments (LCAs). The study compares LCAs of three retrofitting cases: concrete shear-wall strengthening (Case 1); reinforced concrete column jacketing with shear-wall strengthening (Case 2); and high-damping rubber bearing base isolation with viscous fluid damping devices (Case 3). These cases were applied to a five-story reinforced concrete building built according to the design principles widely used in Israel in the 1970s. The seismic-bearing capacity of the retrofitted building was improved in all three cases, where Case 3 was observed as being the most effective retrofitting measure. The environmental performance of the retrofitting measures was assessed using the ReCiPe 2016 midpoint, which indicated that Case 3 was the best with the least environmental impact, Case 1 was intermediate with moderate environmental impact, and Case 2 was the worst with the most environmental impact. However, the ReCiPe 2016 endpoint single-score results showed that Case 3 caused significantly less damage than Cases 1 and 2, which caused similar significant environmental damage. These results indicate that LCA should be used to select an eco-friendly earthquake-resistant design.

This creative work has been published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license which allows copying, and redistribution as well as adaptation of the original work provided appropriate credit is given to the original author and the conditions of the license are met.