0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Integrated. Dis-integrated. Coordinated. Re-integrated

Author(s):
Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, , n. 3, v. 16
Page(s): 253-260
DOI: 10.1017/s1359135513000109
Abstract:

This paper looks at the evolution of the structure of construction contract documentation over time, from ancient Greece through to the near future, in terms of the degree to which the contract documentation is integrated. Documentation might comprise anything from a single ‘integrated’ text to a range of ‘dis-integrated’ documents, fashioned by different players in the procurement process and not offering an easily appreciable integrated whole. The paper ends with the hope that new digital methods of information production will lead to better integrated and more easily readable ‘wholes’ in the new forms offered by building information modelling (BIM), which in turn will facilitate collaborative working.

The paper shows that contract documentation has evolved through four stages of integration: Integrated: up to the end of the medieval period construction contract documentation was essentially fully integrated – everything that was required was stated in the one written document, which typically covered contract conditions, building layouts, assembly descriptions, quantities of components and requirements for quality.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.1017/s1359135513000109.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10355244
  • Published on:
    13/08/2019
  • Last updated on:
    13/08/2019
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine