0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Hierarchical Neural Network and Simulation Based Structural Defect Identification and Classification

Author(s): ORCID

ORCID
Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: Structural Control and Health Monitoring, , v. 2023
Page(s): 1-16
DOI: 10.1155/2023/3555133
Abstract:

A vibration data-driven structural defect identification and classification technique is developed using frequency response under random excitation and a hierarchical neural network. A system of artificial neural networks (ANNs) is trained using finite element simulation-based synthetic data to reduce the need for many sensor measurements required otherwise. Principal component analysis (PCA) is employed to compress the high dimensionality of the vibration response data and eliminate the noise effect in the training and testing. Frequency responses data dimension for the structure with defects such a crack from stress concentration, rivet hole expansion, and attached foreign object mass such as ice accumulation in aircraft wing or fuselage are reduced using PCA and fed to a classifier network. The probabilistic decision output from the classifier network and the compressed data are then fed to the next levels of estimator networks, where each network is dedicated to the individual type of defect for the estimation of the defect parameters corresponding to that class of defect. The methodology is applied to a stiffened panel structure. The cracks and rivet hole expansions are introduced in the rivet line of the stiffener, and the foreign object mass is attached to the panel surface. The results show that it is possible to classify the defects and further estimate the defect parameters with good accuracy and reliability. It was observed that the damage classification network had an accuracy of roughly 95%. The damage localization network for crack as well as rivet expansion had average absolute error of around 2. The damage severity network was also able to perform well with a mean absolute error of about 0.34 for crack length detection and 0.22 for expanded rivet damage. However, the damage localization and severity prediction networks were quite challenging to train in the presence of multiple damages and need further development in the network architecture.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.1155/2023/3555133.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10725422
  • Published on:
    30/05/2023
  • Last updated on:
    30/05/2023
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine