0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Generative design defended Gender differences discussed

Towards a dimensionless topologic rigour

Author(s):
Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, , n. 1, v. 7
Page(s): 4-5
DOI: 10.1017/s1359135503211933
Abstract:

Generative design techniques (‘Digital canopy: high-end computation/low-tech construction’arq6/3, pp230–245) tend to intrigue and slightly scare (arq6/4, pp293–294 – letter from Sam Price) at the same time. It is reassuring to know that computers will only be as smart as we can program them. We can even control if they learn and how they learn. Design capabilities using generative methods agreeably are a product of both how smart we make the generative algorithms and how intelligently designers can make use of them. A human designer alone probably would not have come up with the canopy design built and a computer alone could not have.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.1017/s1359135503211933.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10362395
  • Published on:
    12/08/2019
  • Last updated on:
    12/08/2019
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine