0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Further thoughts on design research

Author(s):
Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, , n. 4, v. 2
Page(s): 6-9
DOI: 10.1017/s1359135500001536
Abstract:

The last issue of arq (no. 7) included an account of the recent Research Assessment Exercise undertaken in United Kingdom university schools of architecture and reported on the latest developments in the long-running debate on whether design can be regarded as research. This same debate has also taken place in Australian universities and Michael Keniger reported on the Refereed Design Scheme which had been evolved to resolve this problem. Here, Simon Pepper, an architectural historian who has been involved in this debate over many years, reflects on the issues and the Australian system.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.1017/s1359135500001536.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10362710
  • Published on:
    12/08/2019
  • Last updated on:
    12/08/2019
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine