0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Experimental study on the seismic enhancement of brick masonry spandrels using a single-sided composite reinforced mortar coating

Author(s):
ORCID



Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, , n. 5, v. 22
Page(s): 2531-2552
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-024-01868-2
Abstract:

The paper reports on four cyclic tests of brick masonry spandrels in reference state and strengthened state. The tests were carried out on full-scale, H-shaped masonry panels to investigate the coupling role of the spandrel in connecting two piers in a historical masonry wall subjected to in-plane lateral actions. Two 250-mm-thick solid-brick masonry samples were tested—one single-leaf, the other two-leaves masonry. Both samples were tested before and after strengthening by applying a Composite Reinforced Mortar (CRM) coating on one surface. The CRM coating consisted of a lime mortar coating (nominal thickness = 30 mm), reinforced with mesh made of Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) that was anchored to the wall by GFRP transverse connectors. For the double-leaf masonry, there were additional transverse connectors made of steel bars in concrete cores (artificial diatones) to prevent masonry leaves separation and to improve the bonding of the CRM coating to the masonry. The test responses are compared in terms of crack pattern, failure mode, resistance, displacement and energy dissipation capacity. The tests showed the effectiveness of the proposed CRM system, which increased the spandrel resistance by 33% and 125% in the single—and double-leaf masonry, respectively, with the ultimate drift being 3.2% (one order of magnitude greater than for the unstrengthened reference samples). Data on energy dissipation and the equivalent viscous damping are also collected and compared. Importantly, the presence of the reinforcing mesh and the composite action of the coating and the wall changed the damage evolution and response mechanism, which resulted in a much better seismic response.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.1007/s10518-024-01868-2.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10770067
  • Published on:
    29/04/2024
  • Last updated on:
    29/04/2024
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine