The Effect of Access to Waterbodies and Parks on Walking and Cycling in Urban Areas

This pilot study investigated whether good and bad access to waterbodies and parks have different impacts on walking and cycling in neighborhoods in urban areas. Focusing on Paris, France, the neighborhoods were classified based on their access to the two natural environments through GIS analysis. Active mobility, past behavior, trip purpose, and subjective evaluation were collected through an online survey. The subjective evaluation included infrastructure satisfaction and the perception of transport mode choice, urban area aesthetic level, safety, health, and preference for active mobility over car use. Descriptive analyses, Mann–Whitney tests, and Fisher’s exact tests were conducted to compare between two access groups and between cycling and walking. Active mobility was mainly performed for utilitarian purposes. Weekly cycling frequency was found to be lower than walking. Access to natural environments mainly impacts walking. Contrary to general belief, cycling frequency is higher in neighborhoods with bad access to waterbodies than in ones with good access. Contrary to expectations, this study found little significant effect on active mobility in the accessibility to both natural environments. This study also highlights the influence of dominant active mobility purposes in urban areas with respect to access to natural environments, and provides a subjective evaluation for active mobility.

This creative work has been published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license which allows copying, and redistribution as well as adaptation of the original work provided appropriate credit is given to the original author and the conditions of the license are met.