^ Development of Methods for Designing Rational Trusses | Structurae
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures


Development of Methods for Designing Rational Trusses


Medium: journal article
Language(s): Latvian
Published in: Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, , n. 3, v. 9
Page(s): 192-197
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2003.10531325

Striving for rationality and long-term reliability is seen in different periods of building activities. Application of linear programming methods has enabled to formalise this striving and to elaborate the necessary mathematical models. But later theoretical and practical investigations have disclosed that not always, when optimising in respect of one criterion, it is possible to obtain solutions rational in other aspects, and this stimulated the application of multicriteria optimization methods. It is useful in this case to apply the ideas of the game theory, game problems solving methods already applied in other building design fields. When adapting methods of the game theory to popular needs for truss designing, a criteria set involving 11 alternatives has been selected. Attempts have been made to find rational truss variants by applying different methods (method of proximity to an ideal point, Wald's and Hurwitz's methods). It has been found when using the method of proximity to an ideal point for rational truss designing that a truss with a sloping brace network and pivoted knots supported by a column and composed of rectangular box shapes is more valuable than other trusses. According to Wald's and Hurvitz's methods, among popular spans of 24 m such a truss is the truss with a lowered bottom chord.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2003.10531325.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
  • Published on:
  • Last updated on: