0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Desarrollo de un algoritmo en Python para la simulación y análisis de fiabilidad de los test multirrespuesta = Development of a Python algorithm to simulate and analyze the reliability of multiple choice tests to evaluate the student knowledge

Author(s):
Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: Advances in Building Education / Innovación Educativa en la Edificación, , n. 2, v. 4
Page(s): 20
DOI: 10.20868/abe.2020.2.4461
Abstract:

AbstractThere are many literatures related with the reliability of true/false and multiple- choice tests and their application in higher education. Choices per question, positive or negative marking, rewards of partial knowledge or how long they should be… The combination of all these parameters shows the wide set of test setup that each examiner could design. Is there any optimized configuration? An extended educational research has tried to answer these questions using probability calculations and empirical evaluations.In this investigation, a novel algorithm was designed with Python code to generate hypothetical examinees with specific features (real knowledge, degree of over-cautiousness, fatigue limit…). High knowledge level implies high probability to know whether an answer choice was true or false in a multiple- choice question. Over-cautiousness was related with the probability to answer an unknown question or the risk capacity of the examinee. Finally, fatigue is directly related with the number of questions in the test. Going beyond its upper limit the knowledge level is reduced and the over-cautiousness is increased. The algorithm launched tests to the hypothetical examinees analysing the deviation between the real knowledge (a feature of the examinee), and the estimated knowledge.This algorithm was used to optimize the different parameters of a test (length of test, choices per question, scoring system…) to reduce the influence of fatigue and over-cautiousness on the final score. An empirical evaluation was performed comparing different test setups to verify and validate the algorithm.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.20868/abe.2020.2.4461.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10506973
  • Published on:
    25/11/2020
  • Last updated on:
    25/11/2020
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine