0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Author(s): ORCID

Medium: journal article
Language(s): English
Published in: Buildings, , n. 7, v. 12
Page(s): 1027
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12071027
Abstract:

Defects in the home cause inconvenience to homeowners and loss to the developer or builder due to cost and damage to reputation. A home warranty deposit exists to protect consumers from home defects. However, it is unclear how much it costs to repair a defect and whether the standard for calculating the warranty deposit is reasonable. This study analyzed the litigation details of 290 home complexes in Korea to investigate defect repair costs and factors affecting them. According to the analysis results, the defect repair cost was 0.538% of the construction cost on average. This is far below 3% of the construction cost, the prevailing standard in the relevant acts. Additionally, there was no case where the defect repair cost ratio exceeded 3%. The actual repair cost for defects was considerably lower than the warranty deposit standard stipulated by the Act. Therefore, this study proposes a method to adjust the warranty deposit collectively and a means to apply it differentially according to the size of the construction cost. This proposal benefits everyone because it protects homeowners and keeps the costs affordable. In addition, it is expected that the warranty deposit can be used as a standard for home construction and post-quality improvement. After analyzing the factors affecting the repair cost, it was found that there was a difference in the repair cost according to the home construction implementor and the construction purchase order method. The warranty deposit system prepares for the possibility that a project owner or builder, who is the project implementor, becomes insolvent. It was found that there was no difference in the repair cost for defects depending on whether the project owner was insolvent. Nonetheless, the possibility of insolvency in the case of a developer was far higher than in the case of a builder.

Copyright: © 2022 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License:

This creative work has been published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license which allows copying, and redistribution as well as adaptation of the original work provided appropriate credit is given to the original author and the conditions of the license are met.

  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10688412
  • Published on:
    13/08/2022
  • Last updated on:
    10/11/2022
 
Structurae cooperates with
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine