^ A Comparison of Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Methods for Intelligent Building Assessment | Structurae
0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

A Comparison of Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Methods for Intelligent Building Assessment

Author(s):

Medium: journal article
Language(s): Latvian
Published in: Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, , n. 1, v. 20
Page(s): 59-69
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2013.801906
Abstract:

The methodology, Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM), refers to finding the best alternative from all of the feasible alternatives in the presence of multiple, usually conflicting, decision criteria. Nowadays, intelligent buildings’ performance that is increasingly evidenced in building design and construction has been analyzed by using MCDM techniques. Intelligent buildings (IBs) are also under assessment according to their IB related characteristics and actual circumstances as a MCDM problem. In this paper, two most known MCDM methodologies, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), are used for intelligent building assessment under fuzzy environment for dealing with the evaluations’ uncertainty and imprecision in which the expert's comparisons that are represented as fuzzy numbers. For this aim, three intelligent building alternatives for a business centre in Istanbul are evaluated by using these two fuzzy MCDM methods and the obtained ranking results are compared.

Structurae cannot make the full text of this publication available at this time. The full text can be accessed through the publisher via the DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2013.801906.
  • About this
    data sheet
  • Reference-ID
    10354618
  • Published on:
    13/08/2019
  • Last updated on:
    13/08/2019