Back to the future: the pragmatic classicism of Australia's Parliament House
Author(s): |
Paolo Tombesi
|
---|---|
Medium: | journal article |
Language(s): | English |
Published in: | arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, June 2003, n. 2, v. 7 |
Page(s): | 140-154 |
DOI: | 10.1017/s1359135503002100 |
Abstract: |
Until the launch of Federation Square in Melbourne, in 1997, Australia's contribution to the history of international architectural competitions consisted essentially of two buildings: the Sydney Opera House, won by Jørn Utzon in 1957, and the Federal Parliament House in Canberra, won by Mitchell/Giurgola and Thorp (MGT) in 1980. While Utzon's building is widely acknowledged as a daring piece of innovative design and one of the architectural icons of this century, MGT's winning scheme for Parliament House drew heavy criticism from the moment the proposal was unveiled: neo-Classicist lines, a Beaux-Artsparti, and the building's occupation of Capital Hill – at the top of the Griffins' 1912 scheme for Canberra – were seen by many as displaying a lack of sensibility towards Australian landscape, culture, and ingenuity, and as the result of a conservative approach to contemporary urban design. |
- About this
data sheet - Reference-ID
10362388 - Published on:
12/08/2019 - Last updated on:
12/08/2019