0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Thinking critically about structural engineering through role-playing games

 Thinking critically about structural engineering through role-playing games
Author(s): , ORCID
Presented at IABSE Congress: Challenges in Design and Construction of an Innovative and Sustainable Built Environment, Stockholm, Sweden, 21-23 September 2016, published in , pp. 732-738
DOI: 10.2749/stockholm.2016.0711
Price: € 25.00 incl. VAT for PDF document  
ADD TO CART
Download preview file (PDF) 0.21 MB

Education plays a major role in the development of a sustainable environment. Therefore, structural engineering education should pay considerable attention to the technical aspects, but it should a...
Read more

Bibliographic Details

Author(s): (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, New Jersey, USA)
ORCID (Icitech, Department of Construction Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain)
Medium: conference paper
Language(s): English
Conference: IABSE Congress: Challenges in Design and Construction of an Innovative and Sustainable Built Environment, Stockholm, Sweden, 21-23 September 2016
Published in:
Page(s): 732-738 Total no. of pages: 7
Page(s): 732-738
Total no. of pages: 7
Year: 2016
DOI: 10.2749/stockholm.2016.0711
Abstract:

Education plays a major role in the development of a sustainable environment. Therefore, structural engineering education should pay considerable attention to the technical aspects, but it should also try to build a more sensitive general public and engineering profession that values sensible and exceptional designs.

This paper presents two experiences developed at Princeton University (US) and at the Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain) aimed to build critical thinking. In these experiences, the students analysed critically the suitability of two bridges (the Streicker Bridge by C. Menn and HNT, and the Assut de l’Or Bridge by S. Calatrava) based on the ideas of Structural Art. To do so, a debate was held with one group of students supporting a specific bridge design, a second one arguing against it and a third one playing the role of the judges to determine the final verdict. The paper provides the details of the organization of the debates as well as evidences of the success of the approach.

Keywords:
structural art education structural criticism critical thinking role-playing game C. Menn S. Calatrava