0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Super-long span bridge aerodynamics: on-going results of the TG3.1 benchmark test – Step 1.2

 Super-long span bridge aerodynamics: on-going results of the TG3.1 benchmark test – Step 1.2
Author(s): ORCID, , , , ORCID
Presented at IABSE Congress: The Evolving Metropolis, New York, NY, USA, 4-6 September 2019, published in , pp. 2644-2649
DOI: 10.2749/newyork.2019.2644
Price: € 25.00 incl. VAT for PDF document  
ADD TO CART
Download preview file (PDF) 0.24 MB

This paper is part of a series of publications aimed at the divulgation of the results of the 3-step benchmark proposed by the IABSE Task Group 3.1 to define reference results for the validation of...
Read more

Bibliographic Details

Author(s): ORCID (Politecnico di Milano)
(RWDI)
(Arup)
(Arup)
ORCID (Politecnico di Milano)
(University of A Coruna)
(University of A Coruna)
(University of A Coruna)
(Bauhaus-University Weimar)
(RWDI)
(COWI)
ORCID (Bauhaus-University Weimar)
(Politecnico di Milano)
(Politecnico di Milano)
(Ramboll)
Medium: conference paper
Language(s): English
Conference: IABSE Congress: The Evolving Metropolis, New York, NY, USA, 4-6 September 2019
Published in:
Page(s): 2644-2649 Total no. of pages: 6
Page(s): 2644-2649
Total no. of pages: 6
DOI: 10.2749/newyork.2019.2644
Abstract:

This paper is part of a series of publications aimed at the divulgation of the results of the 3-step benchmark proposed by the IABSE Task Group 3.1 to define reference results for the validation of the software that simulate the aeroelastic stability and the response to the turbulent wind of super-long span bridges. Step 1 is a numerical comparison of different numerical models both a sectional model (Step 1.1) and a full bridge (Step 1.2) are studied. Step 2 will be the comparison of predicted results and experimental tests in wind tunnel. Step 3 will be a comparison against full scale measurements.

The results of Step 1.1 related to the response of a sectional model were presented to the last IABSE Symposium in Nantes 2018. In this paper, the results of Step 1.2 related to the response long-span full bridge are presented in this paper both in terms of aeroelastic stability and buffeting response, comparing the results coming from several TG members.

Keywords:
benchmark aeroelasticity flutter buffeting long-span bridge