0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Reliability differentiation in ULS checks according to EN1990

 Reliability differentiation in ULS checks according to EN1990
Author(s): ORCID, ,
Presented at IABSE Symposium: Large Structures and Infrastructures for Environmentally Constrained and Urbanised Areas, Venice, Italy, 22-24 September 2010, published in , pp. 366-367
DOI: 10.2749/222137810796024880
Price: € 25.00 incl. VAT for PDF document  
ADD TO CART
Download preview file (PDF) 0.04 MB

In EN1990, action effects in persistent and transient design situations are to be derived according to appropriate combinations of actions. Three different sets can be chosen alternatively in the N...
Read more

Bibliographic Details

Author(s): ORCID


Medium: conference paper
Language(s): English
Conference: IABSE Symposium: Large Structures and Infrastructures for Environmentally Constrained and Urbanised Areas, Venice, Italy, 22-24 September 2010
Published in:
Page(s): 366-367 Total no. of pages: 8
Page(s): 366-367
Total no. of pages: 8
Year: 2010
DOI: 10.2749/222137810796024880
Abstract:

In EN1990, action effects in persistent and transient design situations are to be derived according to appropriate combinations of actions. Three different sets can be chosen alternatively in the National annex: expression 6.10 or the most adverse between expressions 6.10a and 6.10b or the most adverse between expressions 6.10a modified and 6.10b. Since the three formulations are not equivalent in terms of structural reliability, a specific study has been performed to compare the reliability level associated with each of them, in some simple but very clear case studies. Results show that the target reliability level required in EN 1990 for ULS checks is commonly reached using expression 6.10, while expressions 6.10 a and 6.10b can lead to lower values, especially when the C.O.V. of the resistance is high.

Keywords:
reliability reliability index load combinations EN1990 Basis of design