0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Two Structural Systems for Buildings

 Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Two Structural Systems for Buildings
Author(s): , , , ,
Presented at IABSE Symposium: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management, Guimarães, Portugal, 27-29 March 2019, published in , pp. 978-985
DOI: 10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0978
Price: € 25.00 incl. VAT for PDF document  
ADD TO CART
Download preview file (PDF) 0.68 MB

This paper compares the life cycle cost of two commonly used structural systems for buildings: the pre-fabricated steel structural system and the cast-in-situ concrete frame structural system. The ...
Read more

Bibliographic Details

Author(s): (School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250061 China)
(Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University (Copenhagen), Denmark)
(School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250061 China)
(Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University (Copenhagen), Denmark)
(Shandong Handbook Construction Technology Co., Ltd. Ji'nan 250011 China)
Medium: conference paper
Language(s): English
Conference: IABSE Symposium: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management, Guimarães, Portugal, 27-29 March 2019
Published in:
Page(s): 978-985 Total no. of pages: 8
Page(s): 978-985
Total no. of pages: 8
DOI: 10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0978
Abstract:

This paper compares the life cycle cost of two commonly used structural systems for buildings: the pre-fabricated steel structural system and the cast-in-situ concrete frame structural system. The case study of the No.2 experimental primary school building, located in Jiyang County in China, is presented as an illustrative example. The building is designed for six stories with 20.1 m in height and 9713.85 m² construction area, considering 50 years life-span and 7 degrees seismic intensity scale. Ten design solutions are proposed for this case study covering these two types of structural systems, with the combination of different types of interior/exterior walls and slabs. A life cycle cost analysis is performed to evaluate the economic performance among these design alternatives, including the initial cost, construction cost, maintenance cost, removal cost and residual value. The result concludes that the pre-fabricated steel frame structural system has a significant advantage over the cast-in-situ concrete frame structural system from the total life cycle cost perspective.

Keywords:
life cycle cost cast-in-situ structure pre-fabricated building precast structure