0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Qualifications and Internal Checks versus Independent Proof of Structural Design

Qualifications and Internal Checks versus Independent Proof of Structural Design
Auteur(s):
Présenté pendant IABSE Workshop: Ignorance, Uncertainty, and Human Errors in Structural Engineering, Helsinki, Finland, 15-16 February 2017, publié dans , pp. 59-66
DOI: 10.2749/helsinki.2017.059
Prix: € 25,00 incl. TVA pour document PDF  
AJOUTER AU PANIER
Télécharger l'aperçu (fichier PDF) 0.83 MB
Against the background of European standardisation of structural engineering principles, there is intense debate about the extent to which self-regulation and internal inspections can replace indepe...
Lire plus

Détails bibliographiques

Auteur(s): (Checking engineer for structural design – reinforced concrete constructions, Radebeul / Dresden)
Médium: papier de conférence
Langue(s): anglais
Conférence: IABSE Workshop: Ignorance, Uncertainty, and Human Errors in Structural Engineering, Helsinki, Finland, 15-16 February 2017
Publié dans:
Page(s): 59-66 Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 8
Page(s): 59-66
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 8
DOI: 10.2749/helsinki.2017.059
Abstrait: Against the background of European standardisation of structural engineering principles, there is intense debate about the extent to which self-regulation and internal inspections can replace independent inspection of calculations relating to static equilibrium, project scheduling and execution of construction work by a third party. There is also discussion about whether the likelihood of errors decreases and, to a certain extent, whether errors would be unlikely or would not have a significant effect on the stability of buildings, as engineers become better qualified. This contribution examines both questions and gives examples from the author’s practical experience.
Mots-clé:
ISO 9001