0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Internationale Datenbank und Galerie für Ingenieurbauwerke

Anzeige

Qualifications and Internal Checks versus Independent Proof of Structural Design

Qualifications and Internal Checks versus Independent Proof of Structural Design
Autor(en):
Beitrag für IABSE Workshop: Ignorance, Uncertainty, and Human Errors in Structural Engineering, Helsinki, Finland, 15-16 February 2017, veröffentlicht in , S. 59-66
DOI: 10.2749/helsinki.2017.059
Preis: € 25,00 inkl. MwSt. als PDF-Dokument  
ZUM EINKAUFSWAGEN HINZUFÜGEN
Vorschau herunterladen (PDF-Datei) 0.83 MB
Against the background of European standardisation of structural engineering principles, there is intense debate about the extent to which self-regulation and internal inspections can replace indepe...
Weiterlesen

Bibliografische Angaben

Autor(en): (Checking engineer for structural design – reinforced concrete constructions, Radebeul / Dresden)
Medium: Tagungsbeitrag
Sprache(n): Englisch
Tagung: IABSE Workshop: Ignorance, Uncertainty, and Human Errors in Structural Engineering, Helsinki, Finland, 15-16 February 2017
Veröffentlicht in:
Seite(n): 59-66 Anzahl der Seiten (im PDF): 8
Seite(n): 59-66
Anzahl der Seiten (im PDF): 8
DOI: 10.2749/helsinki.2017.059
Abstrakt: Against the background of European standardisation of structural engineering principles, there is intense debate about the extent to which self-regulation and internal inspections can replace independent inspection of calculations relating to static equilibrium, project scheduling and execution of construction work by a third party. There is also discussion about whether the likelihood of errors decreases and, to a certain extent, whether errors would be unlikely or would not have a significant effect on the stability of buildings, as engineers become better qualified. This contribution examines both questions and gives examples from the author’s practical experience.
Stichwörter:
ISO 9001