Bridge design. Can a methodological approach be defined to guarantee a good solution?
|
|
|||||||||||
Détails bibliographiques
| Auteur(s): |
Héctor Beade-Pereda
(Knight Architects, High Wycombe, UK)
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Médium: | papier de conférence | ||||
| Langue(s): | anglais | ||||
| Conférence: | IABSE Conference: Creativity and Collaboration – Instilling Imagination and Innovation in Structural Design, Bath, United Kingdom, 19-20 April 2017 | ||||
| Publié dans: | IABSE Conference Bath, April 19-20, 2017 | ||||
|
|||||
| Page(s): | 47-55 | ||||
| Nombre total de pages (du PDF): | 9 | ||||
| Année: | 2017 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.2749/222137817821232289 | ||||
| Abstrait: |
Every design process is intended to devise a solution (S) to a problem (P). Bridge design is a creative activity, more cognitive (deliberate or spontaneous) than emotional. A sequence of steps where a designer should stop to go from P to S can be set. Although they cannot guarantee that S will be the best of the solutions, following a methodological approach as the one outlined in this article, a good solution which satisfactorily meets all the project requirements shouldn't be a pipe- dream. |
||||