0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • International Database and Gallery of Structures

Advertisement

AAEM versus numerical rheology investigation of composite steel concrete beams

 AAEM versus numerical rheology investigation of composite steel concrete beams
Author(s): ,
Presented at IABSE Conference: Structural Engineering: Providing Solutions to Global Challenges, Geneva, Switzerland, September 2015, published in , pp. 701-708
DOI: 10.2749/222137815818357773
Price: € 25.00 incl. VAT for PDF document  
ADD TO CART
Download preview file (PDF) 0.09 MB
  • The paper presents analysis of the stress changes due to creep in statically determinate composite steel-concrete beam according to (AAEM) method of Bažant in comparison with numerical sol...
    Read more

Bibliographic Details

Author(s): (University of Structural Engineering and Architecture, VSU, “L. Karavelov”Sofia, Bulgaria)
(University of Structural Engineering and Architecture, VSU, “L. Karavelov”Sofia, Bulgaria)
Medium: conference paper
Language(s): English
Conference: IABSE Conference: Structural Engineering: Providing Solutions to Global Challenges, Geneva, Switzerland, September 2015
Published in:
Page(s): 701-708 Total no. of pages: 8
Page(s): 701-708
Total no. of pages: 8
Year: 2015
DOI: 10.2749/222137815818357773
Abstract:
  • The paper presents analysis of the stress changes due to creep in statically determinate composite steel-concrete beam according to (AAEM) method of Bažant in comparison with numerical solution using Volterra integral equations based on EC2 provisions for creep of concrete. The mathematical model involves the equation of equilibrium, compatibility and constitutive relationship, i.e. an elastic law for the steel part and an integral-type creep law of Boltzmann – Volterra and algebraic-type creep law of Trost - Bažant for the concrete part considering the above mentioned models. It is analyzed the migration of stresses from concrete plate to steel beam using two independent Volterra integral equations of the second kind and two independent algebraic equations. The closeness of the results obtained by the two methods is shown with an example from the bridge practice.

Keywords:
rheology steel-concrete section integral equations EC2 model AAEM method