A study on a modelling method for analysis of steel arch bridges
|
|
|||||||||||
Détails bibliographiques
| Auteur(s): |
Kentaro Arimura
Takashi Yamaguchi Masahide Matsumura Junto Ueno |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Médium: | papier de conférence | ||||
| Langue(s): | anglais | ||||
| Conférence: | IABSE Symposium: Engineering for Progress, Nature and People, Madrid, Spain, 3-5 September 2014 | ||||
| Publié dans: | IABSE Symposium Madrid 2014 | ||||
|
|||||
| Page(s): | 40-47 | ||||
| Nombre total de pages (du PDF): | 8 | ||||
| Année: | 2014 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.2749/222137814814027512 | ||||
| Abstrait: |
When using the 3D frame analytical method in bridges design as well as in structural soundness evaluation of existing bridges such as steel arches or steel trusses, as structural responses vary according to modeling methods of bridge members, their margins of safety should be differently evaluated. By examining the effect on analytical and final design results due to differences in modelling methods on a 3D frame analysis of a steel arch bridge, it is confirmed that the method of modelling without secondary members (considered as safe evaluation) does not result in safe evaluation for all primary members. |
||||
| Mots-clé: |
câble
|
||||