0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Standardization of structural performance monitoring: existing documents and open questions

 Standardization of structural performance monitoring: existing documents and open questions
Auteur(s):
Présenté pendant IABSE Symposium: Challenges for Existing and Oncoming Structures, Prague, Czech Republic, 25-27 May 2022, publié dans , pp. 1285-1291
DOI: 10.2749/prague.2022.1285
Prix: € 25,00 incl. TVA pour document PDF  
AJOUTER AU PANIER
Télécharger l'aperçu (fichier PDF) 0.19 MB

Structural Performance Monitoring is usually carried out using indicators to assess the current (diagnosis) or future (prognosis) structural performance concerning specified limit states. The asses...
Lire plus

Détails bibliographiques

Auteur(s): (Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy)
Médium: papier de conférence
Langue(s): anglais
Conférence: IABSE Symposium: Challenges for Existing and Oncoming Structures, Prague, Czech Republic, 25-27 May 2022
Publié dans:
Page(s): 1285-1291 Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 7
Page(s): 1285-1291
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 7
DOI: 10.2749/prague.2022.1285
Abstrait:

Structural Performance Monitoring is usually carried out using indicators to assess the current (diagnosis) or future (prognosis) structural performance concerning specified limit states. The assessment requires the definition of threshold values of the indicators that correspond to the considered limit states. Traditionally, the identification of indicators of the structural condition through continuous and autonomous measurements is addressed as Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). In this paper, a critical review of the existing documents on structural monitoring standardization is carried out, and open research issues and practical hurdles related to the standardization are discussed. The review shows that most of the SHM guidelines and technical codes published in several countries worldwide before 2010 only tackle the diagnostic process. More recent documents explicitly include also the decision-making for integrity management. This evolution in the monitoring purpose reflects a change in integrity management objectives, increasingly driven by the optimization of resources allocation rather than by safety requirements. Further to this, digitalization, and the availability of large volumes of monitoring information, open research avenues related to their use as decision support tools for asset integrity management.

Copyright: © 2022 International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
License:

Cette oeuvre ne peut être utilisée sans la permission de l'auteur ou détenteur des droits.