Probabilistic Finite Element Model Updating of Civil Engineering Structures: A Comparative Study
|
|
|||||||||||
Détails bibliographiques
| Auteur(s): |
Javier F. Jiménez Alonso
(Department of Building Structures, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain)
Emma J. Hudson (College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.) Aleksandar Pavic (College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.) Andrés Sáez 
(Department of Continuum Mechanics and Structural Analysis, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain)
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Médium: | papier de conférence | ||||
| Langue(s): | anglais | ||||
| Conférence: | IABSE Symposium: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management, Guimarães, Portugal, 27-29 March 2019 | ||||
| Publié dans: | IABSE Symposium Guimarães 2019 | ||||
|
|||||
| Page(s): | 1269-1276 | ||||
| Nombre total de pages (du PDF): | 8 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.2749/guimaraes.2019.1269 | ||||
| Abstrait: |
Finite element (FE) model updating of civil engineering structures is usually performed under the modal domain. According to this approach, the value of the main physical parameters of the structure is modified in order to reduce the relative differences between the experimental and numerical modal parameters of the structure. To date, two methods are widely used to perform the FE model updating: (i) the maximum likelihood method and (ii) the Bayesian method. The second method is usually implemented via sampling methods. Thus, the FE model updating consists in determining an efficient sampling of each considered physical parameter of the model. Herein, two sampling techniques, the Metropolis-Hastings (M-H) algorithm and the Slice Sampling (SS) algorithm, are compared when they are implemented for the FE model updating of a laboratory steel footbridge. |
||||