0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Prestressed SCC Bridge Girders under Monotonic and Fatigue Loading

 Prestressed SCC Bridge Girders under Monotonic and Fatigue Loading
Auteur(s): ,
Présenté pendant 18th IABSE Congress: Innovative Infrastructures – Towards Human Urbanism, Seoul, Korea, 19-21 September 2012, publié dans , pp. 927-934
DOI: 10.2749/222137912805111366
Prix: € 25,00 incl. TVA pour document PDF  
AJOUTER AU PANIER
Télécharger l'aperçu (fichier PDF) 0.14 MB

This paper examines the flexural behavior of prestressed self-consolidating concrete (SCC) bridge girders when subjected to monotonic and fatigue loading. Three full-scale prestressed bridge girder...
Lire plus

Détails bibliographiques

Auteur(s):

Médium: papier de conférence
Langue(s): anglais
Conférence: 18th IABSE Congress: Innovative Infrastructures – Towards Human Urbanism, Seoul, Korea, 19-21 September 2012
Publié dans:
Page(s): 927-934 Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 8
Page(s): 927-934
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 8
DOI: 10.2749/222137912805111366
Abstrait:

This paper examines the flexural behavior of prestressed self-consolidating concrete (SCC) bridge girders when subjected to monotonic and fatigue loading. Three full-scale prestressed bridge girders were constructed and tested until failure. One of the girders was made with conventional concrete (CC) and served as a control specimen, while the other two girders were made with SCC. The girders were fitted with composite CC thickening over the top flange to represent composite bridge decks. The control girder and one of the SCC girders were subjected to monotonically increasing load until failure. The remaining SCC girder was subjected to a sequence of fatigue loading series with increasing load amplitudes, followed by monotonic loading until failure. The results show that prestressed SCC and CC bridge girders exhibit identical behavior under monotonic loading. The stiffness of the SCC girder decreased with an increase in the upper limit of the load range even prior to flexural cracking. However, the stiffness did not reduce significantly within the same load range.