Numerical model updating of an aging steel bridge based on a multidisciplinary experimental campaign
|
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur(s): |
Brais Barros
(Universidad de Vigo, CINTECX-Universidade de Vigo-GeoTECH Group, Vigo, Spain.)
Borja Conde (Universidad de Vigo, CINTECX-Universidade de Vigo-GeoTECH Group, Vigo, Spain.) Óscar Bouzas (Universidad de Vigo, CINTECX-Universidade de Vigo-GeoTECH Group, Vigo, Spain.) Manuel Cabaleiro (Universidad de Vigo, CINTECX-Universidade de Vigo-GeoTECH Group, Vigo, Spain.) Belén Riveiro (Universidad de Vigo, CINTECX-Universidade de Vigo-GeoTECH Group, Vigo, Spain.) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Médium: | papier de conférence | ||||
Langue(s): | anglais | ||||
Conférence: | IABSE Symposium: Challenges for Existing and Oncoming Structures, Prague, Czech Republic, 25-27 May 2022 | ||||
Publié dans: | IABSE Symposium Prague 2022 | ||||
|
|||||
Page(s): | 1300-1308 | ||||
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): | 9 | ||||
DOI: | 10.2749/prague.2022.1300 | ||||
Abstrait: |
A large part of the European bridge stock is reaching the end of its design service life. Currently, several applications for numerical models have been emerged, such as damage detection or structural safety assessment, among others. However, accurate numerical modeling is still a challenge. Model input uncertainties can cause large differences between numerical model predictions and actual measured responses from the structure. This fact makes model updating or calibration techniques essential for the aim of reducing such discrepancies. In this study, a model updating methodology is developed and implemented in an aging steel bridge located in a corrosive environment. An extensive and multidisciplinary experimental campaign was first carried out for collecting the necessary geometrical and material properties as well as dynamic data that will be used as a reference for the calibration process. A good agreement was found between the updated numerical model and the experimental modal data obtaining an average frequency error of 2.09% and average MAC (Modal Assurance Criterion) of 0.97. |
||||
Copyright: | © 2022 International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE) | ||||
License: | Cette oeuvre ne peut être utilisée sans la permission de l'auteur ou détenteur des droits. |