0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Management of overweight vehicle traffic on road bridges

 Management of overweight vehicle traffic on road bridges
Auteur(s): , ,
Présenté pendant IABSE Conference: Assessment, Upgrading and Refurbishment of Infrastructures, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 6-8 May 2013, publié dans , pp. 60-61
DOI: 10.2749/222137813806474255
Prix: € 25,00 incl. TVA pour document PDF  
AJOUTER AU PANIER
Télécharger l'aperçu (fichier PDF) 0.57 MB

Bridges in service in most Western Countries were built according to codes with design loads that are now inconsistent with today’s traffic demands. Currently, transportation agencies do not know h...
Lire plus

Détails bibliographiques

Auteur(s):


Médium: papier de conférence
Langue(s): anglais
Conférence: IABSE Conference: Assessment, Upgrading and Refurbishment of Infrastructures, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 6-8 May 2013
Publié dans:
Page(s): 60-61 Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 8
Page(s): 60-61
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 8
Année: 2013
DOI: 10.2749/222137813806474255
Abstrait:

Bridges in service in most Western Countries were built according to codes with design loads that are now inconsistent with today’s traffic demands. Currently, transportation agencies do not know how to respond to transit applications on their bridges. This contribution focuses on the legal issues entailed by overweight/oversize load permits issued by transportation agencies. Indeed, correct decision-making should consider the legal liabilities involved in possible catastrophic events. In this paper we illustrate how this problem is addressed by the Department of Transportation of the Italian Autonomous Province of Trento (APT), a medium-sized agency managing approximately one thousand bridges across its territory. In their basic approach, APT does not authorize movement of overweight loads unless it is demonstrated that their effect is less than that of the nominal design load. When this condition is not satisfied, a formal evaluation is carried out in an attempt to assess a higher load rating for the bridge. If, after the reassessment, the rating is still insufficient, the bridge is classified as sub-standard and a formal evaluation of the operational risk is performed to define a priority ranking for future reinforcement or replacement.