0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Fast, interactive digital design tools to inform decision making in bridge design

 Fast, interactive digital design tools to inform decision making in bridge design
Auteur(s): , , , ,
Présenté pendant IABSE Symposium: Construction’s Role for a World in Emergency, Manchester, United Kingdom, 10-14 April 2024, publié dans , pp. 715-723
DOI: 10.2749/manchester.2024.0715
Prix: € 25,00 incl. TVA pour document PDF  
AJOUTER AU PANIER
Télécharger l'aperçu (fichier PDF) 0.1 MB

In light of the climate crisis, it is important to be able to evaluate both embodied and operational carbon quickly and accurately to ensure the best overall decisions are made. This contribution w...
Lire plus

Détails bibliographiques

Auteur(s): (University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK)
(University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK)
(LimitState Ltd., Sheffield, UK)
(COWI, London office, London, UK)
(COWI, London office, London, UK)
Médium: papier de conférence
Langue(s): anglais
Conférence: IABSE Symposium: Construction’s Role for a World in Emergency, Manchester, United Kingdom, 10-14 April 2024
Publié dans:
Page(s): 715-723 Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 9
Page(s): 715-723
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 9
DOI: 10.2749/manchester.2024.0715
Abstrait:

In light of the climate crisis, it is important to be able to evaluate both embodied and operational carbon quickly and accurately to ensure the best overall decisions are made. This contribution will focus on the use of digital design tools to guide the former, by rapidly identifying the unavoidable embodied carbon associated with the construction of bridges. Practical design tools are introduced in web-app form (LayOpt:BRIDGE) and as a plugin to the Rhino/Grasshopper parametric modelling ecosystem (Peregrine), each giving results in just a few seconds. The speed of these methods facilitates exploration of different sites or materials. The results provide an absolute lower bound on the embodied carbon required, allowing evaluation of the extent to which it is theoretically possible for a given development to be advantageous. Additionally, the benchmark results obtained can be used both qualitatively and quantitatively to inform proposed designs.