0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Evaluating Section Loss in Corroded Steel Strands

 Evaluating Section Loss in Corroded Steel Strands
Auteur(s): , , ORCID
Présenté pendant IABSE Congress: The Evolving Metropolis, New York, NY, USA, 4-6 September 2019, publié dans , pp. 1768-1771
DOI: 10.2749/newyork.2019.1768
Prix: € 25,00 incl. TVA pour document PDF  
AJOUTER AU PANIER
Télécharger l'aperçu (fichier PDF) 0.24 MB

Since corrosion in prestressing tendon reduces the cross-section and strength of steel strand, it is critical for the safety of structures. Corrosion model in steel wires and a technique for evalua...
Lire plus

Détails bibliographiques

Auteur(s): (Seoul National University)
(Seoul National University)
ORCID (Seoul National University)
Médium: papier de conférence
Langue(s): anglais
Conférence: IABSE Congress: The Evolving Metropolis, New York, NY, USA, 4-6 September 2019
Publié dans:
Page(s): 1768-1771 Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 4
Page(s): 1768-1771
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 4
DOI: 10.2749/newyork.2019.1768
Abstrait:

Since corrosion in prestressing tendon reduces the cross-section and strength of steel strand, it is critical for the safety of structures. Corrosion model in steel wires and a technique for evaluating section loss in steel strands were developed based on the measurement of corroded strands obtained from a concrete box girder bridge in Korea. The strands were corroded due to chloride and moisture attack. Cross-sections of corroded wires were measured for section loss, corrosion depth and perimeter. The measurement showed that corrosion rapidly progressed along the perimeter in earlier stage of corrosion, so that the shapes of remaining cross-sections were convex rather than concave which is typical shape of pitting corrosion. Evaluation of section loss in corroded steel strands were conducted using the wire corrosion model. If a strand can be approached from any direction around the strand, section loss could be evaluated within 5% of error.