Disturbance Indicator Benchmark for Urban Bridge Construction
|
|
|||||||||||
Détails bibliographiques
| Auteur(s): |
Jeroen Brouwer
Ruben Vogel Carl Thodesen |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Médium: | papier de conférence | ||||
| Langue(s): | anglais | ||||
| Conférence: | IABSE Conference: Assessment, Upgrading and Refurbishment of Infrastructures, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 6-8 May 2013 | ||||
| Publié dans: | IABSE Conference, Rotterdam, May 2013 | ||||
|
|||||
| Page(s): | 492-493 | ||||
| Nombre total de pages (du PDF): | 8 | ||||
| Année: | 2013 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.2749/222137813806521180 | ||||
| Abstrait: |
European bridges are today in a state of particular concern with over 50% of European urban bridges being more than 40 years old and thus requiring considerable maintenance or possibly even replacement [1]. This means that interventions in the present infrastructure have to be made while ensuring that mobility continues in a safe and consistent manner. Also the (re-)construction of the bridge has to be completed in a sustainable manner with minimum disturbance to the users and local residents. In order to meet the demand for disturbance friendly construction alternatives, a European benchmark of civil engineering projects was created. Ultimately the solution is the use of a Multi Criteria Decision Model (MCDM) linked with the results of the benchmarking assessment in order to weight the selection criteria for the most advantageous construction alternative possible. |
||||