0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Damage Detection in Structures – Examples

Damage Detection in Structures – Examples
Auteur(s): , , , ,
show_more
Présenté pendant IABSE Symposium: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management, Guimarães, Portugal, 27-29 March 2019, publié dans , pp. 471-478
DOI: 10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0471
Prix: € 25,00 incl. TVA pour document PDF  
AJOUTER AU PANIER
Télécharger l'aperçu (fichier PDF) 0.85 MB

Damage assessment of structures includes estimation of location and severity of damage. Quite often it is done by using changes of dynamic properties, such as natural frequencies, mode shapes and d...
Lire plus

Détails bibliographiques

Auteur(s): (University of Zagreb, Croatia,)
(University of Zagreb, Croatia,)
(Lulea University of Technology, SE-971 87 Lulea, Sweden,)
(Lulea University of Technology, SE-971 87 Lulea, Sweden,)
(Lulea University of Technology, SE-971 87 Lulea, Sweden,)
ORCID (Lulea University of Technology, SE-971 87 Lulea, Sweden,)
(School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China)
Médium: papier de conférence
Langue(s): anglais
Conférence: IABSE Symposium: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management, Guimarães, Portugal, 27-29 March 2019
Publié dans:
Page(s): 471-478 Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 8
Page(s): 471-478
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 8
DOI: 10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0471
Abstrait:

Damage assessment of structures includes estimation of location and severity of damage. Quite often it is done by using changes of dynamic properties, such as natural frequencies, mode shapes and damping ratios, determined on undamaged and damaged structures. The basic principle is to use dynamic properties of a structure as indicators of any change of its stiffness and/or mass. In this paper, two new methods for damage detection are presented and compared. The first method is based on comparison of normalised modal shape vectors determined before and after damage. The second method uses so-called 𝑙l-norm regularized finite element model updating. Some important properties of these methods are demonstrated using simulations on a Kirchhoff plate. The pros and cons of the two methods are discussed. Unique aspects of the methods are highlighted.