0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Changeability as an alternative to traditional design

 Changeability as an alternative to traditional design
Auteur(s): , ,
Présenté pendant IABSE Symposium: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management, Guimarães, Portugal, 27-29 March 2019, publié dans , pp. 385-391
DOI: 10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0385
Prix: € 25,00 incl. TVA pour document PDF  
AJOUTER AU PANIER
Télécharger l'aperçu (fichier PDF) 0.7 MB

The built environment is subject to multiple uncertainties, therefore, any investment in building assets is risky at a financial, economic and/or physical level. Traditionally, engineers deal with ...
Lire plus

Détails bibliographiques

Auteur(s): (Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia)
(Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia)
(Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia)
Médium: papier de conférence
Langue(s): anglais
Conférence: IABSE Symposium: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management, Guimarães, Portugal, 27-29 March 2019
Publié dans:
Page(s): 385-391 Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 7
Page(s): 385-391
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 7
DOI: 10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0385
Abstrait:

The built environment is subject to multiple uncertainties, therefore, any investment in building assets is risky at a financial, economic and/or physical level. Traditionally, engineers deal with this problem by designing and constructing systems capable to accommodate expected long-term demands without any significant modification to their structure. However, this strategy comes at a significant cost and implies that the system is overdesign during most of its lifetime. An alternative to this approach is conceiving systems that can change over time, so they are capable to overcome adverse conditions and take benefit from emerging opportunities. In this paper we describe how enabling change improves systems’ economic performance. In the paper, the consequences of changeability are evaluated with respect to the systems’ expected net present value and its variance; this is compared with the traditional financial evaluation of traditional alternatives. This work is a step forward towards understanding of changeability and its advantages over traditional design alternatives.