0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

An unsupervised learning approach by novel damage indices in structural health monitoring for damage localization and quantification

Auteur(s):

Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Structural Health Monitoring, , n. 2, v. 17
Page(s): 325-345
DOI: 10.1177/1475921717693572
Abstrait:

The aim of this article is to propose novel damage indices for damage localization and quantification based on time series modeling. In order to extract damage-sensitive features from time series models, it is essential to choose adequate and robust orders in such a way that the models are able to extract uncorrelated residuals. On this basis, a new iterative order determination method is proposed to select robust orders of time series models under residual analysis by Ljung–Box Q-test. The damage-sensitive features are the parameters and residuals of an AutoRegressive (AR) model obtained from current feature extraction approaches. In this study, the AR model is identified as the most compatible time series model with measured vibration time-domain responses using Box–Jenkins methodology and Leybourne–McCabe hypothesis test. The proposed damage indices are the parametric assurance criterion and the residual reliability criterion that exploit the parameters and residuals of AR models, respectively. The main idea behind locating a damage is to define threshold limits for both damage indices using the features of undamaged conditions based on an unsupervised learning way. The major contributions of this article are to propose an iterative order determination method for time series models and two novel damage indices for locating and quantifying damage. The accuracy and performance of the proposed methods are experimentally demonstrated on a three-story laboratory frame and a model-scale steel structure. Results show that the proposed iterative approach leads to uncorrelated residuals, and the proposed parametric assurance criterion and the residual reliability criterion methods are promising and efficient tools in damage detection problems under varying operational and environmental conditions.

Structurae ne peut pas vous offrir cette publication en texte intégral pour l'instant. Le texte intégral est accessible chez l'éditeur. DOI: 10.1177/1475921717693572.
  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10562046
  • Publié(e) le:
    11.02.2021
  • Modifié(e) le:
    19.02.2021
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine