Toward a Holistic Rating System: An Attempt to Expand the Boundaries of Building Sustainability Using SDGs
Auteur(s): |
Pierluca Vitale
Vincenzo Alfano Tommaso Pastore Costantino Menna Pietro Maffettone Domenico Asprone |
---|---|
Médium: | article de revue |
Langue(s): | anglais |
Publié dans: | Frontiers in Built Environment, janvier 2021, v. 7 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fbuil.2021.679014 |
Abstrait: |
Several frameworks have been developed for mitigating the environmental impact of human activities. Among them, possibly the most forward-thinking are the Sustainable Development Goals set out in UN Agenda 2030, which are often cited by stakeholders at various levels. Nevertheless, when it comes to policy tools, defining goals relating to sustainability is not straightforward. In this contribution, we use a mathematical framework to compare the goals of Agenda 2030 with the assessments possible with three different building-rating systems, BREEAM, LEED and ITACA. Our results show that these tools address sustainability very differently to the intentions of the SDGs. However, a number of minor changes could easily make the assessments produced by these evaluation systems on this issue more complete. |
Copyright: | © 2021 Pierluca Vitale, Vincenzo Alfano, Tommaso Pastore, Costantino Menna, Pietro Maffettone, Domenico Asprone |
License: | Cette oeuvre a été publiée sous la license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0). Il est autorisé de partager et adapter l'oeuvre tant que l'auteur est crédité et la license est indiquée (avec le lien ci-dessus). Vous devez aussi indiquer si des changements on été fait vis-à-vis de l'original. |
2.55 MB
- Informations
sur cette fiche - Reference-ID
10627579 - Publié(e) le:
05.09.2021 - Modifié(e) le:
14.09.2021