0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Auteur(s):
Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Budownictwo i Architektura, , n. 3, v. 18
Page(s): 041-050
DOI: 10.35784/bud-arch.719
Abstrait:

Using Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), the most favorable floor heating system of a detached house has been selected. The analysis also includes an assessment of the performance of this type of heating on small surfaces (up to 20m²). The choice was made among eight heating variants, adopting various systems available on the construction market powered by water or electricity, including traditional with "wet" screeds, "dry" screeds and lightweight floor heating systems without Screeds. From the set of 14 evaluation criteria, the eight most important ones were identified. Using the summed corrected indicator of mathematical analysis, it was assessed that the best variant is a lightweight floor water heating system on a reactive adhesive without screeds with aluminum foil.

Structurae ne peut pas vous offrir cette publication en texte intégral pour l'instant. Le texte intégral est accessible chez l'éditeur. DOI: 10.35784/bud-arch.719.
  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10475574
  • Publié(e) le:
    25.11.2020
  • Modifié(e) le:
    25.11.2020
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine