0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Optimisation Investigation and Bond-Slip Behaviour of High Strength PVA-Engineered Geopolymer Composite (EGC) Cured in Ambient Temperatures

Auteur(s):
ORCID

ORCID
Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Buildings, , n. 12, v. 13
Page(s): 3020
DOI: 10.3390/buildings13123020
Abstrait:

Engineered geopolymer composite (EGC) is becoming an uprising product in the civil industry as a substitute and solution for conventional geopolymer concrete (GPC) as GPC exhibits brittleness and has poor cracking resistance. In this paper, we explored high strength engineered geopolymer composite (EGC) made of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibre and without coarse aggregate constituents characterised as high-performance geopolymer concrete. Varying alkaline solution to fly ash ratio (AL/FA) was investigated. Bond-slip behaviour and the mechanical properties, including compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths, were studied. PVA-EGC mix designs in this research was optimised using response surface methodology (RSM). Various parameters, including the amount of ground granulated blast slag (GGBS) and silica fume, were included in the parametric and optimisation study. Based on the RSM study, the use of quadratic studies found the responses to be well-fitted. Next, the optimised mix design was utilised for the casting of all the samples for the mechanical and bond-slip tests in this study. The main parameters of bonding behaviour include multiple embedment lengths (7 d, 10 d, 12 d and 15 d) and various sizes of rebar diameter used for pull-out tests. Moreover, the mechanical properties and bond behaviours of EGC were compared with those of conventional geopolymer concrete (GPC). The compressive strength of EGC and GPC at 28 days were designed to be similar for comparison purposes; however, EGC shows higher early compressive strength on day 1 compared to GPC. In addition, results indicate that EGC has superior mechanical properties and bond performance compared to GPC, where EGC is approximately 9 and 150% higher than GPC in terms of flexural and tensile strength, respectively. Pull-out tests showed that EGC samples exhibited higher ductility, as evidenced by the presence of multiple cracks before any exhibited failure in tension and flexure. Ductile failure modes, such as pull-out failure and pull-out splitting failure, are observed in EGC. In contrast, GPC specimens show brittle failure, such as splitting failure.

Copyright: © 2023 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License:

Cette oeuvre a été publiée sous la license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0). Il est autorisé de partager et adapter l'oeuvre tant que l'auteur est crédité et la license est indiquée (avec le lien ci-dessus). Vous devez aussi indiquer si des changements on été fait vis-à-vis de l'original.

  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10754326
  • Publié(e) le:
    14.01.2024
  • Modifié(e) le:
    07.02.2024
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine