A Novel Structural Damage Identification Method Using a Hybrid Deep Learning Framework
Auteur(s): |
Yingying He
Zhenghong Huang Die Liu Likai Zhang Yi Liu |
---|---|
Médium: | article de revue |
Langue(s): | anglais |
Publié dans: | Buildings, 1 décembre 2022, n. 12, v. 12 |
Page(s): | 2130 |
DOI: | 10.3390/buildings12122130 |
Abstrait: |
In the past few years, structural health monitoring (SHM) has become an important technology to ensure the safety of structures. Structural damage identification methods based on machine learning techniques have gained wide attention due to the advantages of effectively extracting features from monitoring data. However, the existing machine learning-based methods heavily depend on manually selected feature parameters from raw signals. This will cause the selected feature to obtain the optimal solution for a specific condition but may fail to provide a similar performance in other cases. In addition, the feature selection takes a long time, which can fail to achieve real-time performance in a practical structure. To address these problems, this article proposes a hybrid deep learning framework for structural damage identification that includes three components, namely, ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and a convolutional neural network (CNN). The proposed EEMD-PCC-CNN method is capable of automatically extracting features from raw signals to satisfy any damage identification objective. To evaluate the performance of the proposed EEMD-PCC-CNN method, a three-story building structure is investigated. The acceleration signal of the three-story building structure is first analyzed by EEMD. After obtaining the time-frequency information, PCC is utilized to select optimal time-frequency information as the input of the CNN for damage identification. Compared with other classical methods (SVM, KNN, RF, etc.), the experimental results show that the newly proposed EEMD-PCC-CNN method has significant performance advantages in damage identification. In addition, the accuracy of the proposed damage identification method is improved by more than 4% after utilizing EEMD in comparison with CNN alone. |
Copyright: | © 2022 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. |
License: | Cette oeuvre a été publiée sous la license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0). Il est autorisé de partager et adapter l'oeuvre tant que l'auteur est crédité et la license est indiquée (avec le lien ci-dessus). Vous devez aussi indiquer si des changements on été fait vis-à-vis de l'original. |
15.85 MB
- Informations
sur cette fiche - Reference-ID
10699958 - Publié(e) le:
10.12.2022 - Modifié(e) le:
10.05.2023